Post election thoughts and unlearning anxiety                                 Edited

“Worrying does not take away tomorrow’s troubles. It takes away today’s peace.”
Judson Brewer, MD, PhD

“You see, anxiety hides in people’s habits. It hides in their bodies as they learn to disconnect from these feelings through myriad different behaviors.”  Judson Brewer

“Watch your thoughts. They become words. Watch your words. They become actions. Watch your actions. They become habits. Watch your habits. They become character.” Judson Brewer

I started writing this post on anxiety in the echo of the second round of the general elections in Greece on June 25th.  So, I’ve included a few thoughts on this. Abstention in these elections set a historical record, as almost half of those registered in the electoral rolls did not go to the polls, resulting in the highest abstention rate recorded, at least in the post junta period. There were regions in Greece where abstention reached almost 67%. Interestingly, the voters with the lowest abstention rate were the Greeks abroad. I felt that people before us have had to fight and even risk imprisonment and other consequences in order for us to be able to take voting for granted, and also, that this right is not even in place in some places in the world. If we cherish democracy, however imperfect it may be, exercising rights is important. There was more abstention the second time round which meant that maybe some people chose to visit the beach rather than go to the polls. One of the results is that many candidates from the smaller parties were left out, thus, decreasing the diversity of voices and opinions in parliament. It all saddened me, but I also pondered on whether through not voting people were making a point and that maybe this level of abstention reflected not only passivity and indifference, but also disappointment. The gifted Portuguese writer and recipient of the Nobel Prize in Literature, Jose Saramago, writes: “Abstention means you stayed at home or went to the beach. By casting a blank vote, you’re saying you have a political conscience but you don’t agree with any of the existing parties.”

However, today’s post is about anxiety, inspired by two recent podcasts I listened  to related to Judson Brewer’s work and new book on unwinding anxiety.  However, before I go on, I’d like to add something that I didn’t clarify in the previous post concerning all the different meanings of the word home in English because in Greek the word home does not include so many meanings. So, this paragraph is more relevant to the translation of the last post. The Cambridge dictionary firstly defines home as a house or apartment, where one lives, especially, with family, but home can signify the type of family we come from, a happy or a broken home, for instance. A home is also a place where people can live and be taken care of like a children’s home or an old people’s home. Home additionally means one’s place of origin or place that one might feel a sense of belonging. Home also means one’s country. In Greek we tend to use different words to express these different uses of the word home.

Speaking of home and belonging I’d like to share two old traditional songs that move me to tears sometimes. I’ve recently been listening to some traditional music as I’ve been reading and writing about home, belonging and identity. Some of these seem to connect me to my own sense of Greekness. The first is titled Ξενιτεμένο μου Πουλί / My bird in a foreign land. I recently came across a contemporary rendition by Alkyone, a young musician with an amazing voice [https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=alkyoni+jenitememno+moy+pouli#fpstate……… ]. It talks about someone missing a loved one that has migrated to a foreign land. The second song is titled Neratzoula  / Little Sour Orange Tree. An amazing rendition by the actress Eleni Kokkidou at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ozAJhTab5I\

I’ve written about anxiety before, but not from the viewpoint of anxiety being a habit that we can learn to unlearn. In his new book Rick Hanson writes: “Anxiety can become chronic, a kind of habit, and hard to budge. People can even be anxious about not being anxious, since then they might lower their guard, and get hurt again. It’s important to realize that you can be alert and strong about potential threats while not feeling anxious.” As I mentioned I listened to two recent podcasts [on Tara Brach’s website or on YouTube], in which she and Judson Brewer, MD, PhD, discuss how anxiety is a habit that can be unlearned as we cultivate a curious and kind mindful presence. Dr Brewer offers the scientific grounds for this “unwinding”, drawing on his experience as a leading researcher in the field of mindfulness and addiction.  He treats anxiety similarly to addiction.  They talked about the genesis of worrying, how it perpetuates anxiety and ways we can become disenchanted with this habit, and also, explored particular mindfulness-based strategies like noting what is happening, recognizing our habit loops, arousing our curiosity and cultivating self-care.

Anxiety and fear are common human experiences. Brach comments that worry comes from the word strangle and that anxiety is also the waters we’re swimming in collectively. They discern between adaptive fear and non-adaptive fear and they introduce the idea of treating anxiety and worrying as a habit. Some of the many things people often do to soothe their anxiety, like: drinking alcohol, smoking, turning to chocolate or stress eating, checking phones compulsively, and so on, simply reinforce anxiety because the reward system in our brain is activated. For instance, instead of this hunger signal coming from our stomach, this emotional signal – feeling sad, anxious, etc – triggers the urge to eat. So, practically, every time we use something that momentarily provides pleasure or distraction from our anxiety or fear and triggers the reward system in our brains, negative reinforcement takes place creating a vicious cycle.

There’s a 10 minute video of a TED Talk on YouTube [24 February 2016] by Judson Brewer with the title: A simple way to break a habit, in which this process is briefly explained.

Both Brach and Brewer describe some of their own experiences related to anxiety. Brewer described his experience of panic attacks in his sleep during medical school and  Brach refers to anxiety rising during mediation, experienced as an existential clutch. I think anyone meditating for a while is likely to come into contact with this deeper layer of anxiety, which is present in all of us, to some extent or other, due to many causes, which we may be aware of or not [Gabor Mate writes that “People can be affected by unconscious anxieties and stresses they have no conscious knowledge of whatsoever.”], but also the mere fact that we are aware of our own and our loved ones’ mortality.

They also offer ways to unwind anxiety with awareness. This practically requires our becoming aware or mindful of the habit loop itself and of the quality of the reward, and then, finding the Bigger Better Offer (BBO),We need to notice our spiraling moments and become curious about our anxiety, to see where it is located and how it feels in our body.

One practice they go through is the RAIN practice, which has been more expanded upon by Tara Brach.  I have written about it in previous posts. The R stands for initially recognizing, in this case, the anxiety. The A for accepting what is and that it is here. John Pendergast further notes that when something might be too difficult to accept we might start with an open welcoming acceptance.  Also, I’d like to note that when engaging with exercises and activities it is important to remember that we need to let the pain stay for a while, allow it to transform and teach us, but not allow it to overstay and overwhelm us. We need to titrate the process. The I stands for inquiry, the investigation of bodily experiences and sensations, related core beliefs and thoughts, a getting in touch with the hurt or discomfort.  We might ask ourselves: What’s this anxiety about? What am I getting from this worry? Finally, the N stands for non-identification, which Tara Brach combines with nurture and kindness towards the self, which might involve nurturing ourselves through kind and compassionate words and soothing touch.  Brewer includes a noting process, which is a naming at a deeper level, and in John Pendergast’s adaptation the N is replaced by L, which involves a letting in of a deeper knowing and felt insight. Finally, Rick Hanson’s version of RAIN includes working with the mind after the 4 RAIN steps to build up more inner resources.

Ηome and homecoming                                                         Edited

Home and domicile; country and place of origin; migrations and homecomings; homecoming and belonging

PART ONE

Throughout our lives our domicile, our home, our home country  ies, our migrations, our many homecomings, our homecoming and belonging are all negotiated within our own self, in relationships and the broader cultural and geographic contexts we find ourselves in. I have lived in two countries, in many houses, in several places, and I have travelled a bit to places in Greece and abroad. I now live in a tiny scenic place, a speck on the map, not visible on the globe lamp I have in my sitting room, an island I planned to stay for a year or two, but instead built a home and dropped anchor there.

Depending on whether we’ve lived in one place all our lives or not the felt sense of home or homecoming can include a sense of weaving a net between all the places we’ve been or made a home. Wherever we may find ourselves our remembrances are with us. Home could be experienced as the sum of our experiences that in some sense sculpt our remembrance of all the homes we’ve created and the houses we’ve lived in.

Home is not only an architectural construction, but a psychological one. Juhani Pallasmaa [Finnish architect and writer] claims that “Home is an individualized dwelling, and the means of this subtle personalization seem to be outside our notion of architecture….. Home is an expression of personality and family and their very unique patterns of life. Consequently, the essence of home is closer to life itself than to artifacts.”  Pallasmaa also describes how our body is not separate from its domicile and how the elements of architecture are encounters that interact with memory. Our bodies and movements are in interaction with our environment, and the world and the self inform and redefine each other constantly. He writes: “The inhumanity of contemporary architecture and cities can be understood as the consequence of the neglect of the body and the senses, and an imbalance in our sensory system.”

Many books essays and articles have been written, and much research has been conducted, on the concepts in the title of this post. The concepts can be viewed through different lens and each concept can mean so much. This post today is mostly a loose thread of ideas and lived experience of others’ and my own.

Maya Angelou has said that “You only are free when you realize you belong no place — you belong every place — no place at all.”  Both belonging to ourselves and being grounded in the truth of also belonging here, living with the salient awareness that the planet is our home allows us to better negotiate both belonging and home. Brené Brown has interpreted this quote as follows: “We confuse belonging with fitting in, but the truth is that belonging is just in our heart, and when we belong to ourselves and believe in ourselves above all else, we belong everywhere and nowhere.” In her book, Braving the Wilderness, Brown writes: “Belonging is being accepted for you. Fitting in is being accepted for being like everyone else.

Homecoming can also be felt as touching something that is not necessarily linked to our origins, or the places we reside in, but simply our human essence. As we go about negotiating and exploring our sense of home, our homecomings and belonging I think it is important to remember that we are all an intrinsic part of this planet, the world, the Universe, but the Universe and the planet do not belong to us.

1973

I was born in Australia to Greek immigrant parents. I spent my childhood there and in 1973 we moved to Greece.

2004

I think it was in 2004 that I visited an art gallery in Athens. Can’t say I can recall details of what it was about, but I bought a booklet with the title Home Coming by Hilde Aagaard. It is a collection of different things related to the concepts of home, country and homecoming by artists, writers and other people. I recently had a look at it. Below are some ideas and thoughts about home and homecoming from the book. I’m not quoting, but rather providing the gist of the various pieces:

A suggestion is included in the book for an activity that I have engaged with myself, and if I recall correctly, have in the past used as a writing prompt for my students.

My somewhat adapted version:

Write about the first memory of a place, the first house that you remember in which you lived… focus on the façade, the interior, the ambience, a favourite nook or room, the garden or balcony, welcome any incidents, memories [or emotions] that might arise

Someone focused on being caught between two languages… This is something I can relate to. Being bilingual has brought me much joy and ease, for many years an income, as well as, some pain

Like Hansel and Gretel and other fairy tale characters we often try to find our way back home following breadcrumbs

Memories of houses and dreams of houses…  I  too often ask myself what can real houses  or our homes tell us about our dreams and what are the houses in our dreams telling us about our real life, our psychic structure

The theme of escaping from homes and making homes somewhere or anywhere

An extract from the book referring to the film by Christian Jacque,  La Loi c’est la Loi / The Law is the Law: “He cannot take a step to one country or the other without the risk of being beaten up as a foreigner; he is unable to move in either direction”

One contributor to the book expressed the sentiment of being / feeling rooted somewhere despite his many displacements

Someone else wrote:  “When I was small I used to hug the house on my return from holidays… stretched out my arms and touched the walls…” When my father decided it was time to sell our house and move to Greece there were tears.  I wanted to take a little soil from our Australian garden with me.

Another person describes how despite having lived in many houses in childhood, there  is one experiential home in childhood which moves with him as he has moved and travelled. It is transformed along the way

In a poem about homecoming the poet introduces the themes of mother tongue, of familiar skies and places, of loved ones, and on how on our returning home the places that we have visited become unreal, they feel flat on our return, and we need to fit back into our old skin.

Someone describes how when we return we have both changed and remained the same and the place we have returned to has changed and is also the same…. We vacillate between familiarity and unfamiliarity.

One person wrote about how returning to a childhood house can feel overwhelming. He writes: “the house became a rocking box of terror….”

For some people home was many places

And  someone asserted that home is love, but it still needs a place and time to unfold

2006

In 2006 I read John Bradshaw’s popular book, at the time, Homecoming: Reclaiming and Championing Your Inner Child, on coming home to oneself through revisiting our childhood, reparenting ourselves and restoring the truth

Quote from the book:

“In fantasy and myth homecoming is a dramatic event….In reality exile is frequently ended gradually, with no dramatic external events to mark its passing. The haze in the air evaporates and the world comes into focus…” Sam Keen

Recent decade

In her book, Letter to My Daughter, Maya Angelou wrote: “Thomas Wolfe warned in the title of America’s great novel that ‘You Can’t Go Home Again.’ I enjoyed the book but I never agreed with the title. I believe that one can never leave home. I believe that one carries the shadows, the dreams, the fears and dragons of home under one’s skin, at the extreme corners of one’s eyes and possibly in the gristle of the earlobe. Home is that youthful region where a child is the only real living inhabitant. Parents, siblings, and neighbors, are mysterious apparitions, who come, go, and do strange unfathomable things in and around the child, the region’s only enfranchised citizen. We may act sophisticated and worldly but I believe we feel safest when we go inside ourselves and find home, a place where we belong and maybe the only place we really do…”

“Attuning inwardly felt like a welcome home celebration.” Daniel J. Siegel

Homecoming is also a returning to our body senses and emotions, and to where we are right now.  Sometimes we achieve this through meditation or other mindfulness practices

Experiencing homecoming through or during meditation by Tara Brach:

This meditation focuses on the breath as an anchor for homecoming. We begin with an intentional breath and then establish the natural breath as a home base. The instructions are to rest in the breath. Other waves of sensation or emotion are included when they ask for attention as we cultivate an open and full mindful presence. Our freedom arises as we recognize the formless awareness that is our home, and the natural and ever-changing waves that live through us.

In at least three of his books, Hardwiring Happiness, Resilient and Neurodharma, Rick Hanson writes about the reactive and the responsive mode, which he calls the green zone, where we feel safe, content and a sense of belonging or connection. He believes this is our home base and that we can access this state throughout the day.

June 2023

As I was considering today’s topic  I purchased “The Half Known Life: In Search of Paradise”,  by the non-fiction writer Pico Iyer, who has travelled extensively and written about his travels. I have not read it yet, but I’ve been exploring his work a bit through listening to his talks.

In a talk on identity he discussed how some people are embedded in one culture and some live in the intersection of many cultures either through travelling and migration or diverse ethnic origins. It is also a fact that more and more people find themselves in a refugee status and there are more interacial couples and families. Iyer claims thta being in the intersection of many cultures can give us more lens to see the world. Through travelling and experiencing other cultures we can confront the world, our common humanity and our differences from a place of better understanding and acceptance. Iyer notes that the world is richer than our beliefs and what we know, and that ideas xenophobia and toxic populism can to some extent be overcome by travelling or / and coming into contact with other cultures.

**The extracts from Satir’s books are my own translations from Greek into English, therefore, there might be some differences in the terminology

Virginia Satir

“I see it clearly now, that the family is a microcosm, a miniature of the world. We can study the family to understand the world.” Virginia Satir

“I would of course like to see every institution linked to the well-being of the family.” Virginia Satir

Feelings of worth can flourish only in an atmosphere where individual differences are appreciated, mistakes are tolerated, communication is open, and rules are flexible – the kind of atmosphere that is found in a nurturing family.” Virginia Satir

“We get together on the basis of our similarities; we grow on the basis of our differences.” Virginia Satir

“There are five freedoms: The freedom to see and hear what is; / The freedom to say what you feel and think; / The freedom to feel what you actually feel; / The freedom to ask for what you want; / The freedom to take risks on your own behalf.” Virginia Satir

May is usually the month I begin washing and putting away winter clothes to make room for summer stuff. This involves some reorganizing of closet and cupboard space and my aim is to get most of this out of the way by the end of the month. Anyway, this year I decided to simultaneously tackle other things, as well, like all the non digital photos that weren’t in albums. Meanwhile, along with the arrival of the first summer days, a persistent sore throat and cough have also arrived. All this daily life has to some degree influenced the drawings I’m posting today.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

However, what I’ll be writing about today has to do with Virginia Satir’s work. I’ve wanted to return to it for some time both to refresh my memory, but also to consider her ideas from my current older self and see what feels relevant and true.

Virginia Satir was a charismatic and pioneer psychotherapist and writer, regarded by many as the Mother of Family Therapy. She was the founder of Satir Transformational SystemicTherapy, which is a systemic therapy model that evolved from her work. In this approach, the family system is seen as a unit instead of just a sum of its parts, and the goal of STST is to help individuals and families resolve problems and improve their relationships by transforming the whole family system. There are four basic principles associated with Satir’s approach: the principle of “self”, of communication, of boundaries and of time. Satir’s model of change includes (1) the late status quo, (2) resistance to change (3) chaos (4) integration of new possibilities, and finally, (5) a new status quo. Resistance to change to any established status quo is to be expected because systems and all organisms desire equilibrium and homeostasis – even when it is oppressive or dysfunctional – that may serve the parents or one partner. The therapeutic process often involves going through the stages many times. Forrest Hanson has uploaded a 10 minute video with the title, Why changing is so hard?, in which he briefly explains the important process of homeostasis at an organism and individual level, as well as, at a relational level, and how often family, friends and other social groups, in order to maintain equilibrium, resist or try to hinder and block change because as he notes as one piece of the puzzle tries to change it inevitably puts pressure on the rest of the puzzle.

Moreover, Satir’s work focuses on warmth and empathy, and is holistic in the sense that it takes into account the individual, the family and environmental factors. Satir was interested in the raising of children who value themselves. She believed that the family is a microcosm and that changing and healing the family would contribute to creating a better world.  With this in mind, she travelled to many countries and established professional training groups all over the world. She also integrated meditations and poetic writing into her public workshops and writings.  On my book shelves I found Greek editions of her books, The New Peoplemaking, which I will be writing more about below, and Meditations and Inspirations. Some of her poems and meditations in this little book felt inspiring and some did not resonate so much now.

A short sample from this book:

Feel the treasure in you / The wonder that you are / not only because you are / but because you are a manifestation / of the universal laws / of the Universe / We do not make ourselves / We are only co-creators / Love yourself / because you are / a member of the Universe.

But as I said the book I’ll be focusing here is The New Peoplemaking, which was edited and re-published in 1988, and translated into Greek in 1989. I have this early edition, but I actually bought and read it, about twelve years ago, while I was doing a family therapy course. I found I had enthusiastically highlighted many ideas and points, which gave me a glimpse of my former self. The book reads like a letter from the writer to the reader, and also, contains Satir’s cartoon like sketches, which illustrate the various relational dynamics she describes and the many metaphors she tends to use. She contended that because metaphors create images they reinforce learning. One of her best known metaphors is the “iceberg” through which she suggests that our behaviors are only the top visible layers of the iceberg and that there are many layers underneath, such as, coping, feelings, perceptions, expectations, values, beliefs and yearnings. The book is also packed with experiential exercises.

Other metaphors she often used are the “tapestry” and the “gardener” metaphors. There’s a 14 minute YouTube video with the title:“Virginia Satir on Raising Children Who Value Themselves”, where she expands on these metaphors. Satir says: “Parents need to be good gardeners… and what does the gardener do? They take seeds and they never say to the seed: “Listen, if you don’t grow in a way I want you to grow, I am going to throw you out.” They say: “Now, I am going to find out what are the growing conditions of this… what is the light, fertilizer, temperature…,” and that is what I would like to see people do with children… Also waiting for the seed to sprout… Knowing it takes a while for a seed to sprout, for a seed to unfold itself, and in the meantime you go on trust.”

In this book Satir focuses on the features of family systems and how they can change and become more functional. She distinguishes between dysfunctional families, which tend to be closed systems, and nurturing (functional) families [I’m translating from Greek into English, so I hope I’m as close as possible to the original terms], which are more open systems. Satir proposed that a family is a place where people are made. She found through her work with families and individuals that human beings can become flexible and can change and that adults have the power to positively affect both their own and their children’s behaviors and lives.

Some of the areas and topics she tackles and offers insights into are the fact that surface problems and problematic behaviors are rarely the actual problem. Instead of packing or filing away our emotions and past, working with our blocked experiences can free us to live and relate better. In the book she writes how old unfinished business often become a barrier to full acceptance in relationships and that “as long as we look at the present, but we see the past, more and more the walls of separation will grow higher and higher. If you come across the garbage truck, say so and empty it.”

She has also expanded on the problems that the sense of low self-worth and low self-esteem can cause in relationships and families. The following extracts reveal her views on this topic:

“Feelings of worth can only flourish in an atmosphere in which individual differences are recognized, love is openly expressed, mistakes are used to learn, communication is open and rules are flexible, accountability is developed (the coupling of promise with realization) and honesty is put into practice, in the atmosphere one finds in a nurturing family”.

“By honoring all parts of ourselves and being free to accept them, we build the foundation for high self-esteem / self-worth. The opposite means conflict with nature. Many of us create serious problems for ourselves because we have failed to understand that we are unique beings. Instead, we have tried to fit into a mold to be like everyone else. Some types of education are based on comparison and uniformity. This almost always results in low self-esteem.”

Satir explores different stances of communication and communication games, and some of the outcomes of these. Also, in chapter 7 she discerns five basic modes of responding / communicating: [translation from Greek copy] compromise, reproach, calculation and deception, and direct or flowing, and suggests that we learn these ways of communication when we are very young. …. In terms of the response she calls direct or flowing she writes:  “In this response all parts of the message follow the same direction… voice and words agree with facial expression, body posture and tone. Relationships are free, easy, and honest, and people don’t feel their self-esteem / worth is threatened. This response dispenses with any need for compromise, for blame / reproach, for gathering inside a computer, for constant movement.

Satir also examines the nature and role of rules in families. In her chapter on rules [9] she claims that when there is any family prohibition to mention what is happening or what has happened, then this provides fertile ground for weeds to grow because we are all influenced by everything we hear and see and we automatically try to make meaning of it. She writes: “As we have said, the explanation, if one is not given a chance to check it out, it turns into a “fact”. The “fact” may or may not be accurate, but it is what the person will base their actions and opinions on….  Many children grow up forbidden to comment or question, and by the time they reach adulthood, they see themselves as some variation of a saint or a devil rather than as a living, breathing, feeling human being.

Satir suggests that “the implications of systems thinking for personal, family, and societal behaviour are evident everywhere today.”  In chapter 10 she discusses how there are two types of systems, closed and open. She notes that people cannot develop in a closed system, at best they just survive, and also, that we could all cite countless examples of closed systems to one extent or another, such as dictatorships in modern societies and prisons, but also schools, political parties, and so on. She invites us to ask ourselves: What would you say about the system in your family? Is it open or closed? I would perhaps add that it would be closer to reality to ask: “To what extent is your family or any other system / group open or closed? or Which areas tend to be more closed or open? because it is probably almost impossible for any system to be entirely closed.

She explains that systems consist of many interrelated parts and that every system should possess a purpose or goals, which for families involve enhancing the growth of individuals. She argues that the basic difference between systems involves their relationship to change. While a closed system is more rigid when it comes to change and more disconnected from the outside world, in an open system there is less rigid interconnection among the different members and the outside world, as well as, more awareness of their role in the system. She claims “In the open system the parts are interconnected, responsive, each is sensitive to the others and allow information to flow between their internal and external environments.” Also, in open systems, as opposed to closed systems, self-worth is primary, power and performance secondary. In more closed systems power is more concentrated and much more important than uniqueness, self-worth, free communication and change.

Satir further examines the organization of families, types of families and extended family, family in society, the developmental life cycles, the later years, the family of the future, her own sense of spirituality, world peace, and more.  But, as the post has become quite lengthy I will end here with an extract from the book that is representative of her values.

“Your birth, my birth, everyone’s birth is a spiritual event and cause for celebration. Obviously there is a need to provide the richest context for each child to grow up and become fully human. We haven’t reached that point yet. For many, the miracle of birth is marred by the sad conditions in which children are born. However, when we accept the fact that every child contains the ingredients of a “living and walking” miracle, then we have a basis for establishing positive behavior on a global scale. Certainly, this starts with the family. We are slowly moving towards this reverence for life. In our effort to change behavior, it is easy to crush the spirit, leaving the body crippled and the mind asleep. This approach is largely due to equating a person’s worth with their behavior. Whereas, when we remember that behavior is something learned, we can simultaneously honor the spirit and cultivate a more positive attitude.”